Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Final Review Schedule

Location: Radlab (address below)
Date: Friday, May 7
Time: 12 - 6:30pm

Session 1 [12-3pm]
Reviewers:
Michael MacPhail, dEmios, WIT
Sarah Dunbar, Office dA
Luke Voiland, Shepley Bulfinch
Diego Matho, Director of Design Computing, BAC

Session 2 [3:30-6:30pm]
Reviewers:
Carl Solander, Reverse Architecture, WIT
Garett Hwang, Radlab, BAC
Meghan Webster, Behnisch Studio East
Dennis Michaud, Blu Homes



Radlab, Incorporated
25 Drydock Ave, Floor 6
Boston, MA 02210
W| www.radlabinc.com
E| info@radlabinc
P| 617.440.3588

___

Final Project Description


The final project is an opportunity for you to pursue your own design interests in the context of design computing and digital fabrication. Carefully consider the material we've covered thus far, including software and machining technologies, and the possibilities they offer for design exploration. This project will be carried out in three phases: [1] frame your design problem, [2] design a solution using Rhinoscripting and/or Grasshopper to supplement 3d modeling [3] make a physical model using the laser cutter or 3d printer.

First, write a brief proposal for your design project, describing each phase as thoroughly as possible, including the materials/process/scale of your intended final model. Use the 'Process' outlines from your group projects as a guide, making time estimates for each part of the process. You will choose one machine to use, and clearly demonstrate why you're convinced that machine is appropriate. Your written proposal will accompany a short graphic presentation that you'll make to the class. Feel free to use photographs, sketches, renderings, animations, or any other media that may help you explain your project. Each proposal will be briefly discussed to help focus your goals and answer any questions you may have.

Precedent Studies (Required for Graduate Students, Optional for Undergraduate Students):  As part of your final project you will include 3 detailed precedent studies of projects that have particular significance or relevance to your work. Each of your 3 case studies need to include the following: [a] 1/2 page commentary about why you think the project is relevant to your work, and to the practice of architecture, [b] your own analytical sketches, models, and/or diagrams that express your understanding of the project, [c] appropriate images to document and capture the aspects of the project that are most important you.

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Tice_Final_Proposal







Design Proposal
Design Computing and Digital Fabrication
Don Tice

My initial idea came from the idea of a flowing fabric‐like form along a façade.
I want to create a mold that will be able to duplicate a biomorphic form many times
so that I can play with the concepts of layering and lighting through translucency
and material choices. I intend to generate the effect of a motion blur by rotating a
unit or units on a certain axes to create this overlapping and layering idea of
oscillating planes.

Machine: 3D Printer

Materials: Glycerin with possible color additions to create this translucent play with
light.

Scale: 1’ high by 3’

Time Estimates:
Design: 6 hours to resolve form
Rhino Modeling/scripting: 5 hours
Model Construction: 3 hours
Documentation/Presentation Prep: 3 hours

Budak_Final_Proposal



Piers-Gamble_FinalProposal

Modern Baseball Bat Design
For this project I intend to design a concept model for a modern baseball bat. Today athletic equipment design is growing field. My concept is to design a baseball bat that will both spark inspiration for sports designers as well as make a direct connection to Industrial America today using a symbol of America’s past time. Also I would like to incorporate a sense of city pride by interweaving a representation of Red Sox Nation with Boston as a center for new ideas regarding design.
I will use the laser cutter to create my design, because I would like to make it as close to life size as possible. I will use rhino to create my form and relay it to the laser cutter.
Designing: 4-5 hours
Rhino/Scripting: 6 hours
Converting: 2 hours
Assembling: 3-4 hours
Documenting: 2 hours












Friday, April 2, 2010

3DP Tower

For this project, similar to the Lasercut Tower, you'll work in teams of 6 people. Design a tower composed of an assortment of units wherein difference between units is achieved primarily through graphic and volumetric means, as opposed to formal means. Your tower should be composed of a minimum of 20 units. Take your design from concept to physical model, with enough structural integrity to stand on its own. Organize yourselves and decide who will be responsible for which parts of the process. Rather than 3d printing each individual unit, you'll use the 3d printer as a tool to create a mold or molds for casting each of your units.

Process
Designing (sketching, writing pseudocode and modeling)
Scripting (writing Rhinoscript to generate geometry)
Converting (ensuring all volumes are air-tight, packing into an 8”x10”x8” bbox, and creating .stls)
Fabricating (creating units by casting into 3d printed molds)
Assembling (constructing the model and securing it to a base)
Documenting (collecting and distributing the final script(s), rhino model, and photos for your group)